May condemned as campaigners question NATO summit intervention

Nato leaders meeting to hammer out Russia threats, increase investment and intervention following Manchester attack

THERESA MAY and other Nato national leaders have been condemned for the “spreading of extremism” by campaigners opposing the arms trade and the increase of intervention in the Middle East.

The comments came as the UK Prime Minister travelled to Brussels to meet other leaders today (Thursday 25 May) including US President Donald Trump who she is set to have a meeting to discuss intelligence leaks relating to the Manchester Attack this Monday (22 May).

Following the terror attack which took the lives of 22 people and injured over 120 others, the security services of Germany and the UK revealed that the suicide bomber Salman Abedi has travelled to Turkey and Syria to train with extreme Islamist jihadists.

Campaigners have also pointed to Libya as a current haven for the fostering and training of Islamic State (IS) fighters following the 2011 toppling of dictator Colonel Muammar Minyar Gaddafi and the role of Western Governments in the growth of instability in the region.

“They have failed in their own terms; having further destabilised an already unstable region while killing hundreds of thousands of people and contributing to the spread of extremism.” Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith of Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) said: “Whether it is the destruction of Iraq or the breakdown of Libya, it is civilians who suffer in war. The last 16 years of interventionism have not made any of us safer. They have failed in their own terms; having further destabilised an already unstable region while killing hundreds of thousands of people and contributing to the spread of extremism.”

Theresa May briefed Nato leaders today on the Manchester terrorist attack, at the start of a diplomatic tour that marks the resumption of General Election campaigning in the UK since the raising of the terror level threat to “critical”.

The summit follows Donald Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia, in which he signed-off on an arms deal worth over $110bn. Many of the NATO countries are among the largest arms exporters in the world.

Historians and extremism analysts such as Karen Armstrong have argued that many of the terrorist acts committed in the Middle East and Europe have been inspired by Wahhabism, a particularly extremist interpretation of Islam which has its roots in the state-sponsored teachings of clerics in Saudi Arabia. It was and is lauded and practised in Saudi Arabia since being developed in the 18th century.

In July 2013, the European Parliament identified Wahhabism as the main source of global terrorism.

In July 2013, the European Parliament identified Wahhabism as the main source of global terrorism.

Andrew added: “At present, two-thirds of UK arms exports are going to the Middle East. Saudi Arabia is by far the largest buyer. The UK has licensed over £3 billion worth of fighter jets and bombs since it began its bombardment of Yemen two years ago. A recent government audit found that the US had lost over $1bn of arms in Iraq.

“One way NATO countries, including the UK and Theresa May, can play a positive role in the Middle East is to stop arming and supporting human rights abusing regimes and pouring weapons into the region. We don’t know where these weapons will end up, who will obtain them or who they will be used against.”

Picture: CommonSpace

Check out what people are saying about how important CommonSpace is: Pledge your support today.

Comments

Supreme_Allied_...

Sat, 05/27/2017 - 17:56

Oh the Manchester bombing IS May's fault.

The Queen and her governments since Thatcher are to blame for the deaths of innocents at the hands of radical Islamic terrorism.

It is dreadful, wicked and selfish of the Queen, the royal family and the United Kingdom's officers to insist on imposing their own incompetent rule that gets innocents killed.

If the Queen and royal family had one shred of decency they would leave the country forever to make way for republics and elected presidents who could do a better job against terrorists and their state sponsors than this stupid old woman and her stupid family of all ages.

Here's why the UK government's COBRA security committee and the Scottish government's Resilience Committee are out of their depth and clueless and here's what we need to know before we can defeat these terrorists.

MAY'S & TRUMP'S DEALS WITH THE DEVILS OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM

In April, Theresa May, like Thatcher and UK PM's since, visited Saudi Arabia and she defended her trip to Saudi Arabia, saying "its ties with the UK are important for security and prosperity".

Whereas actually, the UK, the US and world's ties with Saudi Arabia are what is endangering our security because when the world trades with Saudi Arabia we are funding radical Islamic terrorism.

Just the other day, Donald Trump was in Saudi Arabia too, saying much the same thing as Theresa May.

Actually the truth is that the UK and US are being bribed by arms deals and other business deals with the devils of radical Islamic terrorism.

May and Trump are setting aside the Saudi and Pakistani regimes' secret state sponsorship of terrorism that has killed many innocents in our own homelands.

"It's worth it!" the UK and US arms industries and others are telling Trump and May.

So that's why nothing that is said or agreed at the UK's COBRA meetings or the Scottish government's Resilience Committee meetings is going to make the slightest difference to the course or the outcome of the long war that the masterminds who run the deep states of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are waging against the Western civilised world.

Like the UK PMs before May and US Presidents before Trump, they and their forces are going to take their whipping from radical Islamic terrorism and not defeat them because for £100s of billions "this is business" and "the war on terror can wait" (until we get governments worthy of the name).

NATO

Trump and May met the other day at NATO.

NATO requires a political and military anti-terrorist strategy which is beyond the limited wits of Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who as Norwegian Prime Minister failed to prevent a lone-wolf fascist terrorist from mass murdering members of his own party's youth wing at Utøya, Norway in 2011.

If Stoltenberg was out of his depth against one lone-wolf Norwegian fascist we can be sure he is out of his depth trying to defeat radical Islamic terrorism too.

So NATO has to force Stoltenberg out as Secretary General and appoint someone else who is competent, someone like me in fact.

In outline, NATO should employ a strategy of regime-change against the deep Pakistani and Saudi states employing naval blockades and seizing / destroying TV satellites in space to ensure that only our regime-change propaganda is what is being broadcast from space into Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, not regime deep state lies and excuses.

Admittedly, my strategy would be much more effective if I was serving NATO with the support of former US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Therefore NATO really ought to get in contact with Condi to suggest that she and I work as a team to lead NATO as it needs to be led if we are ever to win this war on terror.

Supreme Allied Condista
https://supremealliedcondista.newsvine.com/

CommonSpace journalism is completely free from the influence of advertisers and is only possible with your continued support. Please contribute a monthly amount towards our costs. Build the Scotland you want to live in - support our new media.