Naya Koulocheri: Health is a right, just not for everyone...

Writer Naya Koulocheri says it's vital that health and social inequalities are really understood by those most affected

"WONDERFUL weather, isn't it?"

"Are you travelling for business or pleasure?"

My 65-year-old fellow passenger on a busy four-hour flight was extremely bored and desperately trying to talk to anyone around him. But then, he said something that I will never forget. 

It isn’t some sort of philosophical quote, but, it seems pretty deep to me. He told me that "health is a business that is always going to be around".

Economics, politics, feminism and gender norms, budget cuts and social policies, racism and xenophobia, cultural norms, architecture, environment and climate change - they are all relevant to health.

And he was right.

Many people think that health is something that doesn’t directly involve them; it concerns researchers, advocates, practitioners, health professionals, charities and NGOs, medical students and consultants. They think that there are things more important, more popular, more relevant and more worthy of media coverage and attention than talking about health.

But health isn’t something that should be seen out of context. Economics, politics, feminism and gender norms, budget cuts and social policies, racism and xenophobia, cultural norms, architecture, environment and climate change - they are all relevant to health.

Simply put, as long you aren’t dead, health is relevant to you and to the person next to you. If you're one of the intelligent, beautiful people reading this article (wink, wink), academics and public health researchers, politics geeks and activists, you will say something like: "Duh! This is so yesterday's news," or, "why are you boring us with this?"

Before you move to the article on how you can raise you own silkworms, please hear me out. Certain bizarre individuals among us find it fascinating to talk about health, and about what determines good health. We can write about this for hours and have fun (sort of) while doing it. But, what about the other people around us?

Visit our donate page to help us fund two new reporters

In this parallel world, reality is pretty simple and straightforward: people are obese because they eat too much, they smoke because they want to, they develop addictions because they are too weak, they are poor or unemployed because they are lazy, and did I mention that politics is boring? 

However, my fellow humans, the truth is much more complicated and it sucks. It really sucks.

For example, between 2010 and 2012, if you were an English man you were likely to live until 79.1, but if you were Scottish, well, tough luck. You could be dead by the age of 76.6. Women in Kelvinside and Jordanhill are likely to live until the age of 81.3 and men until 76.3

However, our friends, family, colleagues, ourselves or anybody else that we know and care about that live in Ruchill and Possilpark, are likely to die almost 10 years younger than their neighbours only two miles away (to be precise, at 72.1 years old for women and 63.4 years old for men). 

We have observed that there’s social patterning in: obesity, alcohol-related hospital admissions, smoking and spread of non-communicable diseases – to name a few. 

But at least, over the years, there are fewer people spending time in ill-health, so, good job everyone, things are getting better - right? Well, actually, this is true for only some of us. Between 2011 and 2012, men living in the least posh neighborhoods could spend up to 22.7 years in "not good" health status in comparison to 11.9 years for our compatriots living in the most posh areas

For our sisters living in the least affluent areas things are even worse: they may spend up to 26.1 years in "not good" health, compared to only 12.0 years for their richest sisters.

It will take lots of words and figures to fully explain what we mean by the term 'health inequalities'. For example, did you know that there’s even a social pattern in greenspace availability? The ones among us who live in 'rich neighborhoods', having received some sort of education, are much more likely to play football in their own private garden.

And what if I told you that lack of access to garden space is related with hyperactivity problems, peer problems and conduct problems? Please, add to this the gender factor, meaning that boys are more sensitive to the lack of park access than girls. 

But it’s not just that. Even though we can’t show any significant effect during childhood, we can show an association between access to green space and mental health in later life, especially for women and less privileged individuals in terms of socioeconomic resources. 

Yes, life is unjust, but this injustice can actually kill us or somebody we know. I hate being melodramatic or cliché, but it is worth drawing attention to these issues whenever and wherever we can.

You know what else is pretty shocking? For the lucky ones that, as children, could go out and enjoy their awesome gardens, as they grow older, their brains will work better than the ones not having access to green space.

And this is not all. There's a social pattern in suicide rates. Those who are unemployed are 2-3 times more likely to commit suicide, and those living in the least affluent areas are twice as likely to get admitted to hospital due to non-fatal self-harm. 

A Scottish study showed that if you belong in the lowest income class and live in the poorest geographical area, you might be 10 times more likely to express suicidal behaviour than your richest fellow citizens, living in the most posh neighbourhoods. 

By now, you have probably guessed that inadequate unemployment benefits, poor (or non-existent) active labour market programmes, low income, poverty, bankruptcy, loss of home, unmanageable debt, lack of local job opportunities, and closure or downsizing of local workplaces, can make a person think of the unthinkable.

What I mention here is a fraction of the available evidence on this issue. We have observed that there’s social patterning in: obesity, alcohol-related hospital admissions, smoking and spread of non-communicable diseases – to name a few. 

Yes, life is unjust, but this injustice can actually kill us or somebody we know. I hate being melodramatic or cliché, but it is worth drawing attention to these issues whenever and wherever we can; it is our duty to hold policy makers accountable for their actions (or absence of them). 

At the end of the day, we need to keep fighting, so that positive change may benefit the people that need it the most.

Picture courtesy of D. Sinclair Terrasidius

Look at how important CommonSpace has become, and how vital it is for the future #SupportAReporter