SNP members rebel against party leadership in call for more radical #LandReform at #SNP15

Conference motion on party policy defeated by members who say proposals are too weak

SNP MEMBERS have knocked back the party's official land reform policy in a call for stronger action to tackle the unequal ownership of land in Scotland at the party's conference in Aberdeen.

In a major victory for grassroots campaigners , 570 party delegates rejected the motion backed by land reform minister Aileen McLeod MSP, minister Marco Biagi and MSP Mike Russell.

Four hundred and forty delegates backed the current party policy represented by the current Land Reform Bill, which has been criticised by campaigners for not going far enough.

Nicky Lowden MacCrimmon, who led the call to reject the position, asked: "Does radical land reform leave 750,000 acres of land in offshore tax havens?

"Does radical land reform leave tenant farmers with no right to buy?

"I don't think as a party we are being as radical as we can be, as we have the powers to be on land reform."

"When you have radical land reform then we'll sign up to it," he said.

Minister Aileen McLeod conceded that the current bill could be improved and strengthened, with amendments expected in areas of land ownership and offshore ownership: "I know that many of you want to see the Land Reform Bill improved further," she admitted.

McLeod promised to consider all amendments proposed by the Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment (RACCE) committee.

Mike Russell MSP, a member of the RACCE committee and supporter of the motion, said he would work to strengthen the bill in key areas, including on human rights and ownership.

CommonSpace has previously reported concerns that civil service lawyers were holding back a proposal to require land in Scotland to be registered within the European Union.

Russell said that "no organisation should hide behind a trust in any part of the world" and that "an amendment will come forward" on that issue.

The push for greater action on land reform from SNP members represents a boost for the 'Our Land' campaign , which says the Land Reform Bill doesn't go far enough.

Leading Our Land campaigner and broadcaster Lesley Riddoch welcomed the conference vote: "Amazing news from #SNP15. I hear conference remitted [rejected] leadership motion on land reform because it was not strong enough. Well done to rank and file members," she said on Twitter.

Jen Stout from the Scottish Land Action Group told CommonSpace: "There can't be a clearer message for SNP leadership than for its own members to remit the proposed land reform bill in such large numbers, and insist on much stronger measures. We expect amendments on this bill to give it real teeth - particularly on the measures to tackle tax haven ownership."

A party fringe event tonight [Friday 16 October] on land reform is expected to be packed out with over 400 people signed up for tickets.

Picture: CommonSpace

Comments

Geoff Bush (not verified)

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Robert Ross (not verified)

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

markryle

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

markryle

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

William Steele

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

William Steele

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Steve West

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Steve West

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

DAVID SMART

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

DAVID SMART

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Bill Fraser

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Bill Fraser

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Andrew Stuart's picture

Andrew Stuart

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Andrew Stuart's picture

Andrew Stuart

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Paul Smith

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Paul Smith

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Jon

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Jon

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Andy Ellis

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Andy Ellis

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

Malki80

Fri, 10/16/2015 - 23:40

I was one of the delegates who asked the party to think again and strengthen the stance on this issue. What the discussion/debate proves is that the SNP is a healthily democratic party - the debate was robust and collegiate, and the "remit back" verdict shows an appetite for a more radical approach - maybe a much more radical approach.

Malki80

Sat, 10/17/2015 - 08:11

Great opportunity for the SNP to prove that it doesn't want a passive electorate and is really encouraging active participation in policy making. Corporate party politics needs to go.

The referenced service lawyers and fracking lobbies should also be named and not kept in anonymity by the media. Otherwise they remain protected, enigmatic and untouchable. They are hugely significant in the manipulative culture of corporate politics.

CommonSpace journalism is completely free from the influence of advertisers and is only possible with your continued support. Please contribute a monthly amount towards our costs. Build the Scotland you want to live in - support our new media.